Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

217 F. 555

Docket No. 2364.

Boyd v. Wall

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1914.)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1914-08-17

Dietrich, Judge. In the matter'of the Lane Lumber Company, Limited, bankrupt. Appeal by Samuel L. Boyd, trustee, from an order (210 Fed. 82), allowing the claim of Mary Wall to a vendor’s lien.

3 counsel of record

Relies on Boyd v. Wall · Hirlinger v. Boyd · In re Lane Lumber Co.

Affirmed · Opinion by VAN FLEET · Decided 1914-08-17

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Idaho, Northern Division; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge.

¶2In the matter'of the Lane Lumber Company, Limited, bankrupt. Appeal by Samuel L. Boyd, trustee, from an order (210 Fed. 82), allowing the claim of Mary Wall to a vendor’s lien.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4See, also, 217 Fed. 546, 550, 133 C. C. A. 398, 402.

¶533. N. La Veine, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for appellant.

¶6John II. Wourms, of Wallace, Idaho, amicus curise.

¶7Frank Langley, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for appellee.

¶8Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and YAN FLEET, District Judge.

¶9VAN FLEET, District Judge.

¶10This, like case No. 2363 (Boyd v. M. K. Wall, 217 Fed. 550) just decided, is an appeal from a judgment affirming the order of tlie referee awarding a vendor’s lien upon property of the bankrupt, and arises out of the same bankruptcy proceeding. Excepting only as to the traet of land involved and the date -of sale, the material facts are not to bo distinguished in legal effect from those in the last-mentioned ease; and, as the appeal is submitted practically upon the briefs in that case and no new points are urged, no'further discussion is required, hut the judgment may be affirmed on the authority of the opinion filed in that case.

¶11It is so ordered.

/217/f1d/555 · .json · Public domain