Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 F.1d 753 - The Elenore

The Elenore’s Empirical Analysis

217 F. 753 · 1914

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 1919
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Monongahela River Consol. Coal & Coke Co. v. Schinnerer · Carey v. Donohue · Pugh v. Snodgrass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such opportunities always afford distinct advantage in determining the value of testimony; and, unless there is a decided preponderance against a decree or judgment rendered under such circumstances, the rule in this court is not to disturb it. Monongahela River Consol. C. & C. Co. v. Schinnerer, 196 Fed. 875 , 879, 117 C. C. A. 198 ; In re Snodgrass, 209 Fed. 325 , 326, 126 C. C. A. 251 ; Carey v. Donohue, 209 Fed. 328 , 333, 126 C. C. A. 254 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.