Burd v. McCullough’s Empirical Analysis
217 F.2d 159 · 1954
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Evansville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Winsor · Stiers v. Mundy · Kramer v. Beebe · Wayne Township v. Brown · Brumfield, Tr. v. State Ex Rel. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"No action of any kind for damages, whether brought in contract or tort, based upon professional services rendered or which should have been rendered, shall be brought, commenced or maintained, in any of the courts of this state against physicians, dentists, surgeons, hospitals, sanitariums, or others, unless said action is filed within two [2] years from the date of the act, omission or neglect complained of."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chaffin v. Nicosia · Guy v. SCHULDT“"In 1919 the legislature enacted a statute letting the owner or occupant of land sold for taxes redeem that land within two years. Sec. 64-2301, Burns' Repl. 1951. At the same time the legislature specifically provided that infants, etc., could redeem within two years after expiration of their disability. Sec. 64-2302, Burns' Repl. 1951. If the 1919 legislature had thought that the 1881 statute was an exception to its 1919 limitation on redemption, it would have been unnecessary to specifically exclude minors, etc., in that act."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chaffin v. Nicosia
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.