Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

217 F.2d 21

Docket No. 11743.

Lee Kwok Dun v. Brownell

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 29, 1954.

Decided Nov. 18, 1954.

Writ of Certiorari Denied Jan. 31, 1955.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-11-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1957

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 309 (Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005)

Relies on Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc. · Simmons v. Federal Communications Commission · Anderson Bros. v. Board of Supervisors of Washington County

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1954-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See 75 S.Ct. 341.

¶2Mr. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶3Mr. Joseph M. F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for ap-pellee. Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, and William R. Glendon and William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, entered appearances for appellee.

¶4Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The plaintiff Lee Kwok Dun brought this suit against the Attorney General for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff is a citizen of the United States. The District Court, after a hearing, entered judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

¶7Affirmed.

/217/f2d/21 · .json · Public domain