Appolonio v. Baxter’s Empirical Analysis
217 F.2d 267 · 1954
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2009
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Engl v. Ætna Life Ins. · Surkin v. Charteris · Plemmons v. Pemberton · Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co. · Milam v. Launder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although the burden is on the moving party to demonstrate clearly that there is no genuine issue of fact, the opposing party must sufficiently disclose what the evidence will be to show that there is a genuine issue of fact, to be tried.” [quoting Surkin v. Charteris, 197 F.2d 77, 79 (5th Cir. 1952)]. The assertion in affidavits of the appellants that at the trial the claimants may produce further evidence does not preclude the granting of a summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“* * * mere formal denials or general allegations which do not show the facts in detail or with precision, are insufficient to prevent the award of summary judgment * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to pierce the allegations of fact in the pleadings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.