Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 F.3d 360 - Stevie Don Jackson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

Stevie Don Jackson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division’s Empirical Analysis

217 F.3d 360 · 2000

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 104 Ohio St. 3d 142 - Morgan v. Eads (2004), Burdine v. Johnson (2001)

10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky · Evitts v. Lucey · Ross v. Moffitt · Caspari Superintendent Missouri Eastern Correctional Center et al Bohlen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here can be no question that the granting of a motion for rehearing lies entirely within the discretion of a court of appeals. Rehearing at that point is by no means an appeal of right.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “opportunity to file a motion for rehearing should be considered the last step in [Jackson's] first appeal of right ... would surely create a new rule”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is susceptible of vindication only on habeas review”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.