Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 F.3d 761 - United States v. Hursh

United States v. Hursh’s Empirical Analysis

217 F.3d 761 · 2000

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably United States v. Lopez (2001), United States v. Rodriguez-Castro (2011)

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

530200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Allen v. United States · United States v. Davis · United States v. Rigby · United States v. McClintock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the impeachment value of the prior crime; (2) the point in time of the conviction and the witness's subsequent history; (3) the similarity between the past crime and the charged crime; (4) the importance of defendant's testimony; and (5) the centrality of defendant's credibility.” United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 768 (9th Cir.2000). 6 . Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(2) provides that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Based on the defendant’s role in the offense, decrease the offense level as follows: (a) If the defendant was a minimal participant in any criminal activity, decrease by 4 levels. (b) If the defendant was a minor participant in any criminal activity, decrease by 2 levels. In cases falling between (a) and (b), decrease by 3 levels.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.