Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 FRD 229 - In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2010
most recently cited

2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “previously and successfully argued that [the wholly-owned subsidiary] should not be required to respond to a request propounded on [the parent] because they are separate entitpes]” and now advanced”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.