Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1802 · 16 U.S.C. § 1853 · 16 U.S.C. § 1855 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Califano v. Sanders · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n · Walter O. Boswell Memorial Hospital v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pre-decisional documents are those prepared in order to assist an agency decisionmaker in arriving at his decision rather than to support a decision already made.... Deliberative materials are those that reflect[ ] the give-and-take of the consultative process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“fish which are harvested in a fishery, but which are not sold or kept for personal use, and includes economic discards and regulatory discards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oceana, Inc. v. Ross“enhanc[e] the quality of agency decisions by protecting open and frank discussion among those who make them within the Government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oceana, Inc. v. Ross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.