Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Ga. App. 310 - Huff v. Valentine

217 Ga. App. 310 - Huff v. Valentine’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2012

20 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 194 Ga. App. 840 - Derbyshire v. United Builders Supplies, Inc. · 141 Ga. App. 358 - Ayers v. Yancey Brothers Co. · Tuggle v. Tuggle · 81 Ga. App. 841 - Jones v. Rich's Inc. · Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. McQuarie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No plaintiff may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time for the same cause of action and against the same party. If two such actions are commenced simultaneously, the defendant may require the plaintiff to elect which he will prosecute. If two such actions are commenced at different times, the pendency of the former shall be a good defense to the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A former recovery or the pendency of a former action for the same cause of action between the same parties in the same or any other court having jurisdiction shall be a good cause of abatement. However, if the first action is so defective that no recovery can possibly be had, the pendency of a former action shall not abate the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.