State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably State v. Holloway (1976), 15 Kan. App. 2d 476 - State v. Cruz (1991)
2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Swain v. State of Alabama · Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · State v. Lamb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant in a criminal action is not necessarily entitled to be tried by a jury with even a single member of his race thereon. (State v. Reed, 214 Kan. 562 , 520 P. 2d 1314 ; State v. Clift, 202 Kan. 512 , 449 P. 2d 1006 , cert. den. 396 U. S. 910 , 24 L. Ed. 2d 186 , 90 S. Ct. 225 ; and Lee v. State, 204 Kan. 361 , 461 P. 2d 743 .) Furthermore, systematic or purposeful exclusion of members of a race from jury service may not merely be assumed or asserted— it must be established by proof. . . (p. 190.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Henry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.