Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Kan. 475 - State v. Sisson

State v. Sisson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Nunn (1989), State v. Jackson (1986)

30 state decisions

160197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jones · State v. Hampton · State v. Conley · State v. Gonzales · State v. Snyder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(2) . . . The precise time of the commission of an offense need not be stated in the indictment or information; but it is sufficient if shown to have been within the statute of limitations, except where the time is an indispensable ingredient in the offense. . . . “(4) The court may permit a complaint or information to be amended at any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different crime is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'it is not unusual for uncertainty as to dates to appear particularly where the memories of children are involved.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Where a defendant is not misled or prejudiced in making his defense by the allegation concerning the date of the crime charged, that date is unimportant, and a conviction may properly follow upon sufficient proof of the commission of the offense at any time within the provisions of the statute of limitations.” (State v. Sisson, 217 Kan. 475, Syl. 3, 536 P.2d 1369 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.