Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Kan. 595 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2003 · most notably State v. Steward (1976), State v. Baker (1976)

50 state decisions

3801975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ritson · State v. Creekmore · Andrews v. Hand · Holt v. State · State v. Gauger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a criminal case, the issue on appeal is not whether the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether the evidence is sufficient to form the basis for a reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the state.” (Syl. 5.)”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Admissibility of evidence is largely within the discretion of the trial judge, subject to exclusionary rules. . . . “In discussing relevancy, we have frequently said that to be admissible in the trial of a case evidence must be confined to the issues, but it need not bear directly upon them. To render evidence of collateral facts competent, there must be some natural, necessary or logical connection between them and the inference or result which they are designed to establish. . . .” ( 217 Kan. at 599 .)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““When the trial court conducts a full preliminary inquiry on the admissibility of an extrajudicial statement given by an accused, determines the statement was freely, voluntarily and intelligently given and admits the statement into evidence at the trial, this court on appeal should accept that determination if it is supported by substantial competent evidence.” (Syl. 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.