Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 MICH 654 - Lubetsky v. Standard Fire Insurance

Lubetsky v. Standard Fire Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2012

3 state decisions

201922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Home Ins. v. Koob · Traders' Insurance v. Pacaud · Niagara Fire Insurance v. Scammon · People v. . Farmer · Fox v. Phenix Fire Ins.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule applicable in such cases is stated in 14 R. C. L. p. 1310: “ ‘A provision in a policy that in ease of any other insurance on the property insured, made prior or subsequent to the policy, the assured shall be entitled to recover no greater proportion of the loss than the sum insured bears to the whole amount so insured therein, applies only to cases where the insurance covers the same interests, and can have no application to insurance obtained upon another distinct insurable interest in the property, citing Traders’ Ins. Co. r. Pacaud, 150 Ill. 245 ( 37 N. E. 460 , 41 Am. St. Rep. 355 ); Home Ins. Co. v. Koob, 113 Ky. 360 ( 68 S. W. 453 , 58 L. R. A. 58, 101 Am. St. Rep. 354 ); Ætna Fire Ins. Co. v. Tyler, 16 Wend. (N. Y.) 385 ( 30 Am. Dec. 90 ); Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. Scammon, 144 Ill. 490 ( 28 N. E. 919 , 32 N. E. 914 , 19 L. R. A. 114).’ * * * “See, also, 4 Joyce on Insurance, § 2490; 4 Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance, p. 3105; Johnson v. Insurance Co., Holmes (U. S.), 117 ( 13 Fed. Cas. 776 ); Fox v. Insurance Co., 52 Me. 333 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “both policies were on the same property, on the same interest in the property, against the same risks, and payable to the same parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “insurance which is obtained by a third person and upon another distinct and insurable interest cannot be regarded as 'other insurance'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.