Williams v. Peabody’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 district · 32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hall · Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc. · Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of Education · Glenn v. Wagner · 200 N.C. App. 162 - Carcano v. JBSS, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Under the doctrine of res judicata or claim preclusion, a final judgment on the merits in one action precludes a second suit based on the same cause of action between the same parties or their privies.' 'For res judicata to apply, a party must show that the previous suit resulted in a final judgment on the merits, that the same cause of action is involved, and that both the party asserting res judicata and the party against whom res judicata is asserted were either parties or stand in privity with parties.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“the threshold requirement of the exception to the rule requiring privity of identities.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“privity denotes a mutual or successive relationship to the same rights of property.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.