State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Whalen v. United States · State v. Lovelace · Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge · State v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy has no application where two separate and distinct crimes are committed as the result of one and the same act, because the constitutional proscription is directed to the identity of the offense and not to the act. Consequently, multiple punishments can be imposed for the same act without violating the double jeopardy provisions of the Constitutions, state and federal, where imposition of the multiple punishments is specifically authorized by state statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.