State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2015
2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Edwards v. Arizona · Solem v. Stumes · 22 Cal. 3d 749 - People v. Arbuckle · State v. Turner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since we are dealing in criminal cases with human liberty, shortcuts from the Irish requirements will not be tolerated. The appellant was entitled to be informed of the nature of the charges and to a court determination that she understood them. She was not accorded that right. Therefore, the convictions must be reversed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ponec“In Turner we embraced the ABA Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Irish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.