Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 N.J. Super. 51 - State v. Hamilton

217 N.J. Super. 51 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Pointer v. Texas · Barber v. Page · State v. MacOn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o effort was made to enlist the aid of local police or prosecuting authorities ... to locate the witness”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “beyond the jurisdiction of the court's process to compel appearance,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “proponent ... is unable, despite due diligence, to procure [his] attendance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.