217 N.J. Super. 51 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Pointer v. Texas · Barber v. Page · State v. MacOn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o effort was made to enlist the aid of local police or prosecuting authorities ... to locate the witness”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“beyond the jurisdiction of the court's process to compel appearance,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“proponent ... is unable, despite due diligence, to procure [his] attendance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.