Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 P.3d 278 - State Ex Rel. A.H.

State Ex Rel. A.H.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2020

4 state decisions

20200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. B.R. · State in Interest of ML · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · In the Interest of J.C.O. v. Anderson · First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Schamanek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rely heavily on the juvenile court's assessment and weighing of the facts in any given case. Because of the factually intense nature of such an inquiry, the juvenile court's decision should be afforded a high degree of deference.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “led to instability that would prevent her from providing the Children with stable, long-term care. The caseworker also testified about the Children's current foster family and their progress during that placement. ¶ 5 Mother testified and denied being at Valley Fair Mall or Wells Fargo on November 16, 2007. When the juvenile court further questioned Mother about being in the van that had been impounded by police on that date, Mother insisted she was not and tried to explain, but the court insisted on a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The court shall in all cases require the petitioner to establish the facts by clear and convincing evidence, and shall give full and careful consideration to all of the evidence presented with regard to the constitutional rights and claims of the parent[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.