Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 P3D 291 - In Re Marshall

In Re Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen · 156 Wash. 2d 196 - In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Poole · Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall · 126 Wash. 2d 454 - Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Gillingham · Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anshchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As an initial matter, we recognize that an attorney's refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his or her behavior should not automatically be considered a factor in aggravation of punishment, particularly in the face of an honest and objectively reasonable belief in one's own innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although [respondent] has shown no penitence for his actions, we do not penalize him for making arguments in his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`[u]nchallenged findings of fact are treated as verities on appeal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.