In Re Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen · 156 Wash. 2d 196 - In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Poole · Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall · 126 Wash. 2d 454 - Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Gillingham · Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anshchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As an initial matter, we recognize that an attorney's refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of his or her behavior should not automatically be considered a factor in aggravation of punishment, particularly in the face of an honest and objectively reasonable belief in one's own innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although [respondent] has shown no penitence for his actions, we do not penalize him for making arguments in his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[u]nchallenged findings of fact are treated as verities on appeal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.