State v. Strode’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

63 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1. The proponent of closure or sealing must make some showing [of a compelling interest], and where that need is based on a right other than an accused’s right to a fair trial, the proponent must show a ‘serious and imminent threat’ to that right. “2. Anyone present when the closure motion is made must be given an opportunity to object to the closure. “3. The proposed method for curtailing open access must be the least restrictive means available for protecting the threatened interests. “4. The court must weigh the competing interests of the proponent of closure and the public. “5. The order must be no broader in its application or duration than necessary to serve its purpose.””

   10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Castro · State v. Tinh Trinh Lam

2. “[a] defendant should not be able to assert the right of the public ... to overturn his conviction when his own right to a public trial has been safeguarded.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. In Re Stockwell · State v. Applegate

3. “[A] `defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial [does] not effect a waiver.'”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. LEYERLE · State v. Leyerle