Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 P3D 841 - People v. Jimenez

People v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably People v. Gladney (2010), People v. Buerge (2009)

30 state decisions

210200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Edwards v. Arizona · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the court polled the jurors after they returned their verdicts, and all of them affirmatively indicated that they had found defendant guilty of second-degree murder. Thus, we need not guess whether the jury's verdict accurately reflected its collective conclusion concerning defendant's guilt or innocence of second-degree murder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[ilf scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Evidence of other offenses or acts that form part of the criminal episode or transaction with which a defendant is charged is admissible to provide the fact-finder with a fall understanding of the events surrounding the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.