Hanson v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · Sobelman v. Sobelman · Hernandez v. Hernandez · 927 So. 2d 981 - Matajek v. Skowronska · 780 So. 2d 164 - Lopez v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n award of alimony must be based on the income that is available to the party, i.e., the party's net monthly income.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The judgment is also deficient for failing to look to the parties' net incomes in assessing need and ability to pay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The ability to pay alimony must be based on the party's net income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.