Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 So. 3d 1266 - State v. Lee

217 So. 3d 1266 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · New York v. Ferber · 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based on the foregoing, it cannot be said that the jurisprudence supports Defendant's assertion that the scientific community has rejected the methodology and theory of firearms identification. To the contrary, even after publication of the [2009] NAS Report, courts have addressed, in detail, the reliability of such testimony and ruled it admissible, although to varying degrees of specificity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “was not aware of any error rate with respect to the type of testing he performed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.