Paulk v. Paulk’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stack v. Stack · Hutton v. Hutton · Oliver v. Oliver · Lepeska Leasing Corp. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE · East v. East
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). In Paulk I , this court reversed the trial court's July 21, 2015, judgment to the extent that that judgment "found the mother in contempt of court and insofar as it offset the amount the mother owed for the [parties'] children's activity fees, books, and uniforms associated with their attendance at UMS-Wright Preparatory School against the amount the father owed for child support.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“found the father in contempt for failing to pay child support and his portion of the children's medical expenses and found the mother in contempt for failing to pay the children's educational expenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to calculate the amounts the parties owe.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.