Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

217 S.W.3d 344

State v. Sidner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-03-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Elliott Sidner appeals his conviction, after a bench trial, for trafficking in the second degree and possession of marijuana under thirty five grams. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 10 years. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/217/sw3d/344 · .json · Public domain