Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 SW3D 744 - In Re Graves

In Re Graves’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 335th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Clewis v. State · Bentley v. Bunton · Davenport v. Garcia · Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc. · Emerson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party is entitled upon timely request to an opportunity to be heard as to the propriety of taking judicial notice and the tenor of the matter noticed. In the absence of prior notification, the request may be made after judicial notice has been taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re CL
  2. “(1) an imminent and irreparable harm to the judicial process will deprive litigants of a just resolution of their dispute, and (2) the judicial action represents the least restrictive means to prevent that harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Court of Criminal Appeals has recently held that when required findings have not been made, we must first abate the appeal so that the required findings can be made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.