Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Va. 290 - Shoosmith v. Scott

Shoosmith v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably Shoosmith v. Scott (1977), Albin v. Albin (1979)

5 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

1101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eaton v. Davis · Higgins v. McFarland · Brinn v. Brinn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Changing alimony; effect of stipulations as to alimony. Upon petition of either party the court may increase, decrease, or cause to cease, any alimony that may thereafter accrue whether the same has been heretofore or hereafter awarded, as the circumstances may make proper; provided, however, if a stipulation or contract signed by the party to whom such relief might otherwise be awarded is filed with the pleadings or depositions, then no decree or order directing the payment of alimony, suit money, or counsel fee shall be entered except in accordance with that stipulation or contract unless such party raise objection thereto prior to entry of the decree.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the present case, however, the wife’s right to alimony does not depend alone upon the final decree of divorce. Instead, her right arises from a property settlement agreement approved and confirmed by the chancellor in the final divorce decree...” 217 Va. at 292 , 227 S.E.2d at 731 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any court may affirm, ratify and incorporate in its decree dissolving a marriage or decree of divorce whether from the bond of matrimony or from bed and board, any valid agreement between the parties, or provisions thereof, concerning the conditions of the maintenance of the parties, or either of them and the care, custody and maintenance of their minor children. Where the court affirms, ratifies and incorporates in its decree such agreement or provision thereof, it shall be deemed for all purposes to be a term of the decree, and enforceable in the same manner as any provision of such decree. The provisions of this section shall apply to any decree hereinbefore or hereinafter entered affirming, ratifying and incorporating an agreement as provided herein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.