Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Ala. 664 - Wible v. Abraham

Wible v. Abraham’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1935
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strand Amusement Co. v. Fox · People's Bank v. Moore · Alexander City Bank v. Home Ins. Co. of New York · Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield & Co. · Reliance Equipment Co. v. Sherman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless the purchaser has notice of facts which should arouse suspicion in the mind of one of ordinary business prudence that the consideration has failed, or is so likely to fail that he becomes a participant in a fraud on the maker , he is protected. The maker takes the risk of a future failure of consideration, and cannot pass it on to the indorsee who has taken it on the faith of the unconditional promise shown upon the face of the note.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.