Bordner v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1933

California Supreme Court · decided 1933-07-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1971

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“In this matter the petition to review the order of the board of governors of The State Bar, recommending that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law, was not filed in this court within sixty days after the filing of the certified copy of the decision of said board of governors with the clerk of this court. Petitioner has therefore failed to comply with section 26 of the State Bar Act (Stats. 1927, p. 41) fixing the time within which petitions for the review of orders of the board of governors must be filed. For this reason the petition is dismissed.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including In Re McKenna

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-07-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1THE COURT.

¶2[1] In this matter the petition to review the order of the Board of Governors of The State Bar, recommending that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law, was not filed in this court within sixty days after the filing of the certified copy of the decision of said Board of Governors with the clerk of this court. Petitioner has therefore failed to comply with section 26 of The State Bar Act (Stats. 1927, p. 41) fixing the time within which petitions for the review of orders of the Board of Governors must be filed. For this reason the petition is dismissed.