Pohl v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably 20 Cal. 2d 286 - Rogers v. Warden (1942), Everett v. Gilliland (1943)
12 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. · Ferguson v. Koch · 66 Cal. App. 478 - Sullivan v. Helbing · Carr v. Howell · 93 Cal. App. 261 - De Garmo v. Petitfils Confiserie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`If he speaks at all, he must make a full and fair disclosure.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“... the representations made to appellant were ones calculated to induce him to buy the stock and he did, in fact, make the purchase; therefore, the presumption is that the representations induced him to do so, and in order to take away his right to relief on the ground of fraud, it must be shown that he did not rely upon said representations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.