Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 CALAPP4TH 1312 - Brewer v. Carter

Brewer v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 51 Cal. 3d 1130 - In Re Marriage of Arceneaux · Smith v. Superior Court · 220 Cal. App. 3d 230 - In Re the Marriage of Aninger · 142 Cal. App. 4th 1538 - Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San Diego · 62 Cal. App. 4th 1367 - In Re Marriage of Torres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if any of the following are true: "(1) This state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state. "(2) A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under paragraph (1), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the grounds that this state is the more appropriate forum under Section 3427 or 3428, and both of the following are true: [¶] (A) The child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state other than mere physical presence. [¶] (B) Substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships. "(3) All courts having jurisdiction under paragraph (1) or (2) have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under Section 3427 or 3428. "(4) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 3424, a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if any of the following are true:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.