State v. Couture’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
49
cited by 49 later decisions
3
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
49 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bourjaily v. United States · Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Castaneda v. Partida · Delaware v. Fensterer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A jury is presumed to have followed die trial court’s instructions. [Citation omitted.] A criminal juiy’s sole function is to set aside the personal prejudices of its individual members, to weigh dispassionately die evidence set before it, and, on die basis of the trial court’s instructions, to determine whether the state has proved die defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citations omitted.] That a jury returns a verdict of guilty in a given case, therefore, has nothing to do with die ‘possible predispositions’ of a juror, and everything to do widi the particular factual and legal contours of the case as it was presented to the jury. Standing alone, the fact that a jury returns a guilty verdict is not probative of the personal views of the individual jurors.” 218 Conn, at 319.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The fourteenth amendment has long been held to forbid unequal treatment at the venire stage of jury selection”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.