The Giulia’s Empirical Analysis
218 F. 744 · 1914
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably Waterman S. S. Corp. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. (1946), J. Gerber & Company v. S.S. Sabine Howaldt, Her Engines, Etc., and Against Howaldt & Company, Pan American Trade Development Corporation v. S.S. Sabine Howaldt, Her Engines, Etc., and Against Howaldt & Company (1971)
11 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Perils of the seas are understood to mean those perils which are peculiar to the sea, and which are of an extraordinary nature or arise from irresistable force or overwhelming power, and which cannot be guarded against by the ordinary exertions of human skill and prudence.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'are of an extraordinary nature or arise from irresistible force or overwhelming power, and which cannot be guarded against by the ordinary exertions of human skill and prudence.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.