Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1914.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1914-11-09

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>

1 counsel of record

Relies on Vacuum Engineering Co. v. Dunn · Patents Selling & Exporting Co. v. Dunn

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1914-11-09

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Edwin J. Prindle and Arthur Wright, both of New York City, for appellant. L. F. H. Betts, of New York City, for appellee.

¶3Before LACOMBE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an application to recall the mandate (209 Fed. 219, 126 C. C. A. 313), to admit as part of the record certified copies of certain foreign patents, and to issue a new mandate thereon, similar to the one in the suit of Patents Selling Company against this same defendant ([D. C.] 204 Fed. 99), where the same patents were in like manner introduced. To do this will undoubtedly be equitable, and since there is no technical, nor indeed any other, objection made to the granting of the relief prayed for, the application is granted.