Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 F.2d 366 - Beasley v. United States

Beasley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

218 F.2d 366 · 1954

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1987 · most notably Arizona v. Washington (1978), Leary v. United States (1967)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1501954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 231 (Civil Obedience Act of 1968)

Relies on Alford v. United States · Campbell v. United States · Weldon v. United States · Collazo v. United States · Sanford v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Clearly it would be improper, for impeachment purposes, to show accusation, arrest, or indictment as well against the accused in a criminal trial as against a witness in any case, civil or criminal. We have pointed out in furtherance of this principle that where the time for appeal had not expired, evidence of a conviction is inadmissible. * * * We are satisfied that the intendment of our Code * * * requires that there be a final conviction before ‘such fact may be given in evidence.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.