Nevarez v. Brownell’s Empirical Analysis
218 F.2d 575 · 1955
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 801
Relies on Heikkila v. Barber · United States v. Ju Toy · Gonzalez-Gomez v. Brownell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““" * * He came into the country in violation of the orders excluding him and cannot now take advantage of his own illegal action to give the court jurisdiction * # *»”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frausto v. Brownell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.