Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

218 F.2d 603

Docket No. 96, Docket 23109.

Prutzman v. Commissioner

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 13, 1955.

Decided Jan. 26, 1955.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-01-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1962

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-01-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard P. Jackson, New York City (William B. Van Buren III, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner.

¶2Elmer J. Kelsey, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Daniel A. Taylor, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ellis N. Slack and Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

¶3Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

¶4*604PER CURIAM.

¶5Decision here must turn upon the determination of issues of fact, and we are content to affirm on the basis of Judge Van Fossan’s findings and conclusions which we accept. Petitioner complains that the judge has failed to give due effect to all the evidence presented, but we think it apparent that he was in fact considering the total picture, even though he may not have chosen to itemize each bit of relevant data.

¶6Affirmed.

/218/f2d/603 · .json · Public domain