Browning v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 18, 1955.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-01-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1955

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edwin M. Browning in pro. per.

¶2No appearance for respondent.

¶3Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.

¶6His application to appeal forma pau-peris was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.