Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

218 F.2d 867

Docket No. 12442.

Proctor v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 19, 1955.

Decided Feb. 3, 1955.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-02-03

2 counsel of record

Relies on Lanham v. United States

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-02-03

¶1Mr. Robert Alfred Brown, a member of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Hamilton W. Kenner, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and E. Riley Casey, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3*868Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crimes of housebreaking and larceny. The appellant urges that there was insufficient evidence to justify submission to the jury and that the trial court should have directed a verdict of not guilty. We find there was ample evidence to justify the verdict. See Lan-ham v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 857, 185 F.2d 435.

¶6The judgment is therefore

¶7Affirmed.

/218/f2d/867 · .json · Public domain