Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 F.3d 1160 - Katherine Sturdevant v. Marijane a Paulsen Edwin Ray Jane Abbott State Board of Community Colleges and Occupational Education

Katherine Sturdevant v. Marijane a Paulsen Edwin Ray Jane Abbott State Board of Community Colleges and Occupational Education’s Empirical Analysis

218 F.3d 1160 · 2000

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield Of Utah (2006), Frazier v. Simmons (2001)

10 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions

390200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Edelman v. Jordan · Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. · Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation · Regents of University of California v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the state’s legal liability for a judgment; (2) the degree of autonomy from the state—both as a matter of law and the amount of guidance and control exercised by the state; and (3) the extent of financing the agency receives independent of the state treasury and its ability to provide for its own financing.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legal liability for a judgment, rather than [on the] practical, or indirect, impact a judgment would have on a state's treasury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because of the open-ended nature of the arm-of-the-state analysis, it is easy to become caught up in the minutiae of state law, such as the extent of control over the Board by the executive and legislature, the details of the risk management funds operation, and the proportional sources of the Board’s funding. These details, however, must not eclipse a fundamental distinction ... between alter egos or instrumentalities of the state on the one hand, and political subdivisions such as cities and counties on the other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.