In re Relafen Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
34 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. · Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of Atlanta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appropriate to certify the class as currently defined while maintaining its authority later to amend the definition to exclude members who have not suffered injury because they would not have benefitted from reduced prices of [TRI-COR®] or its generic equivalents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All persons or entities in the United States or its territories who purchased Relafen directly from defendants at any time during the period of September 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.