218 F. Supp. 2d 708 - NSY, INC. v. Sunoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2801 (Petroleum Marketing Pract) · 15 U.S.C. § 2802 · 15 U.S.C. § 2805 (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Brach v. Amoco Oil Co. · Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sun Refining and Marketing Company, Formerly Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania v. Pat J. Rago · Doebereiner v. Sohio Oil Co. · Di Napoli v. Exxon Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he PMPA gives the franchisee a cause of action against the franchisor for violations of the Act's provisions, including the right to seek a preliminary injunction prior to the expiration of the franchise agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.