Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Ga. App. 289 - Lockett v. State

218 Ga. App. 289 - Lockett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Henderson · State of Ga. v. Alford · 168 Ga. App. 693 - Lang v. State · 178 Ga. App. 563 - Hill v. State · State of Ga. v. Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to have standing to contest the forfeiture, [McFarley] must demonstrate that she is an “owner” of the forfeited property as that term is outlined in the statute. OCGA § 16-13-49 (a) (7) defines an “owner” as a person “who has an interest in property and is in compliance with any statute requiring its recordation or reflection in the public records in order to perfect the interest against a bona fide purchaser for value.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.