Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Kan. 637 - State v. Shienle

State v. Shienle’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
7
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably Stevenson v. State (1980), State v. Johnson (1977)

26 state decisions

1101976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Ker v. State of California · United States v. Di Re · McDonald v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When an arrest without a warrant is made by a Kansas police officer outside the territorial limits of his jurisdiction the arrest may be a legal private citizen’s arrest when it is established that: (1) arrests by private citizens are recognized as legal in the state where the arrest is made; (2) a felony has been or was being committed in that state; (3) the arresting officer had probable cause to believe the person arrested is guilty thereof; and (4) the officer acted reasonably under the exigencies attending the arrest.” Syl. ¶ 4.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““An arrest [in Oklahoma] is made by an actual restraint of the person of the defendant, or by his submission to the custody of the officer.” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 190 . “A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person: “1. For a public offense, committed or attempted in his presence. “2. When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence. “3. When a felony has in fact been committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it. “4. On a charge, made upon reasonable cause, of the commission of a felony by the party arrested.” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 196 . “A felony is a crime which is, or may be, punishable with death, or by imprisonment in the State prison.” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 5 . “The following persons are liable to punishment under the laws of this State: “1. All persons who commit, in whole or in part, any crime within the State. “2. All who commit theft out of this State, and bring, or are found with the property stolen, in this State. . . .” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 151 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.