Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Kan. 752 - State v. Lassley

State v. Lassley’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2011

22 state decisions

10019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Clingerman · State v. Darling · State v. Pettay · State v. Jordan · State v. Hovis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(2) Willful conduct is conduct that is purposeful and intentional and not accidental. As used in this code, the terms ‘knowing,’ ‘intentional,’ ‘purposeful,’ and ‘on purpose’ are included within the term ‘willful.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This instruction must not be confused with PIK Crim.3d 54.01 . . . which is a rule of evidence and does not purport to charge the jury to find criminal intent necessary for conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.