Korotki v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘The cases on the subject are far from clear, but we think they support the proposition that after a judgment or decree is affirmed on appeal, the lower court may not entertain a motion to reopen, and the same rule applies to a reversal and remand for further proceedings, as to matters decided by the appellate court.’ See Pinkney v. Jay & Mason, 12 Gill & J. 69; McClellan v. Crook, 7 Gill 333 ; Young v. Frost, 1 Md. 377 ; Maryland Steel Co. v. Marney, 91 Md. 360 [ 46 A. 1077 ]; Winter’s Executors v. Gittings, 102 Md. 464 [ 62 A. 1033 ]; United Rys. Co. v. Corbin, 109 Md. 52 [ 71 A. 131 ]; Rent-A-Car Co. v. Fire Ins. Co., 166 Md. 447 [ 171 A. 350 ].””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Turner v. Housing Authority

2. “something in the nature of a bill of review ... for newly discovered evidence or perhaps for fraud, even after affirmance in whole or in part,” Id. at 194 , 145 A.2d at 768 ; however, it made clear that, when the case has been reversed and remanded,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Tu v. State