Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 218 Md. 433 - Thompson v. Upton

Thompson v. Upton’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably 64 Md. App. 442 - Leese v. Baltimore County (1985), Hearst Corporation v. Hughes (1983)

3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

150197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. D'ALESANDRO · Foley v. Hoffman · Bowie v. Evening News · Pollitt v. Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc. · Woolston v. Montana Free Press

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have so recently had occasion to pass upon the legal principles involved herein, Pollitt v. Brush-Moore, Etc., Inc., 214 Md. 570 , 136 A. 2d 573 , that it will be unnecessary to unduly elaborate upon them. * * * We shall not attempt to do what has baffled the Courts for these many years, namely, to compose an all-inclusive definition thereof. However, libel includes any unprivileged (i.e. a publication not having an absolute privilege), false and malicious publication which by printing, writing, signs or pictures tends to expose a person to public scorn, hatred, contempt or ridicule, Foley v. Hoffman, 188 Md. 273, 284 , 52 A. 2d 476 ; and also embraced therein is any such publication that relates to a person’s office, trade, business or employment, if the publication imputes to him some incapacity or lack of due qualifications to fill the position, or some positive past misconduct which will injuriously affect him in it. Foley v. Hoffman, supra; Pollitt v. Brush-Moore, Etc., Inc., supra, at p. 577.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.