218 Md. App. 230 - Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dorsey v. State · State v. Lancaster · Snowden v. State · Abeokuto v. State · White v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we look first to whether the charges 'arose out of the same act or transaction,' then to whether 'the crimes charged are the same offense,' and then, if the offenses are separate, to whether 'the Legislature intended multiple punishment[s] for conduct arising out of a single act or transaction which violates two or more statutes[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[In a harmless error analysis, the issue is not what evidence was available to the jury, but rather what evidence the jury, in fact, used to reach its verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Marks“contain distinct elements that are not included in the other,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.