People v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 1926
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Marxhausen · People v. Halveksz · People v. De La Mater · People v. Mayhew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The jury should have been instructed by the judge that as the officer had no warrant for the arrest of defendant and no search warrant that he had no right to search the grip, unless he was invited to do so, and that in the absence of such invitation they should find the defendant not guilty.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.